Commences 10 December 2026

Your software makes decisions about people. Soon you'll have to explain them.

A new transparency obligation commences under the Privacy Act on 10 December. If your agency uses anything that scores leads, estimates prices, or decides who gets contacted first — this applies to you. Most agencies don't know it's coming.

What's changing

You have to say what your systems decide — and what they use to decide it

From 10 December 2026, organisations using computer programs to make — or materially assist in making — decisions that significantly affect people must disclose it in their privacy policy. Plainly. Including what information those systems use.

The drafting is broad on purpose. It captures AI tools, rule-based systems and automated assessment technologies alike. You don't have to be "using AI" in any dramatic sense to be caught by it.

In a real estate agency, that plausibly includes

Most agencies use at least two. Most would struggle to explain how any of them reached a particular outcome.

And they're already looking

Real estate was named first

In January 2026 the OAIC ran its first-ever proactive privacy compliance sweep — around 60 organisations across six sectors, chosen because they collect personal information face to face.

The concern was people handing over their details at an open home, with no real visibility of how that information would be used.

Penalties have been reported up to $66,000. But the money isn't the significant part. The significant part is that the regulator is no longer only responding to complaints after something goes wrong. An agency can come under scrutiny with nothing having gone wrong at all.

Why I'm writing this

I built a system that argues with me

I'm a licensed agent, still listing and selling. I've spent the last six months building software to take the admin out of running a campaign — the appraisal, the copy, the vendor reports, the settlement chain.

Somewhere in that, I built something I didn't expect to matter this much.

Appraisal · compliance check
✕ Will not print
This estimate isn't supported. Your low figure sits 28% below the cheapest comparable you've attached. An estimated selling price is a regulated representation under the Property and Stock Agents Act — it has to be supported by the evidence in the document.
Two comparables in this range were excluded automatically: both sold more than 24 months ago.

An actual output. It refuses to produce the document.

I built that because I didn't want to accidentally underquote. It turns out that being able to show why a system reached a conclusion is about to be a legal requirement, not a preference.

Every tool in this industry is built to produce things faster. From December, you also have to be able to explain what they decided and why.